Tbecame clear he could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.
Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.
In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.
For example, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.
Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.
But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.
Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?
This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not creating the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.
Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.
And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using too much that system. Bring in the process guy and then discard him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.
A seasoned financial analyst with over a decade of experience in global markets and trading strategies.
News